Book a scoping call
Home / Work / Hyperliquid Vault Platform & Darwinex Zero Track
Quantitative finance Colabs venturePre-launch, audited

Hyperliquid Vault Platform & Darwinex Zero Track

Native on-chain vaults with a faithful trade-mirroring bridge, plus a funded-track submission.

What we set out to build

A way for other people to allocate to the founder's strategies without handing over custody, and a credible external track record to sit alongside it.

What was built

  • Native Hyperliquid vaults with the market-making engine bridged to them
  • A mirroring layer that replicates the resting order ladder faithfully — same offsets, post-only flags and scaled sizes — rather than just copying net position
  • Three vault protocols on a shared core: one BTC-denominated, one for real-world-asset synthetics, one open with onboarding incentives
  • EVM tradability through both a taker-mirror router and resting maker orders using EIP-1271 signatures
  • A Darwinex Zero submission as an independent, externally-verified track record

What it achieves

  • A round-two adversarial audit produced 7 confirmed findings and 14 refuted; all 7 were fixed and the record kept in the repository
  • Browser signing is never used: the design makes it structurally impossible to be phished into signing something
  • The mirroring layer is tested to 105 tests covering order-level fidelity, not just position
The hard part: Copying a position is easy. Copying a *market maker* is not: the value is in the resting ladder, and a mirror that only tracks net exposure reproduces none of it. Getting order-level fidelity right was most of the engineering.

The stack

Python, TypeScript, Solidity, Hyperliquid, 1inch LOP v4.

Common questions

How was this built?

This was built through Colabs, our sister company. A founder brought the idea and the domain knowledge, Colabs brought the team, the founder funded the build with a monthly subscription, and they hold equity in the company that resulted. We label every case study, because a studio that publishes its prices and argues the other side of its own comparisons has to be equally precise about its own portfolio.

What state is it in?

Pre-launch, audited. We state that plainly rather than describing everything as production: several things here are deliberately gated, and the reason is usually evidence rather than a missing feature.

Can you build something like this for us?

That is the point of publishing it. The same patterns are in the catalogue at published prices, and you can scope your own version on the plain-English page without contacting us first.

Where to next

If something here is close to what you need, the same patterns are in the catalogue at published prices, or you can describe your version in plain English and get it scoped and priced without talking to anyone.

[ // / QUANTITATIVE FINANCE ]

Other quantitative finance work

Built with the same discipline, in the same domain.

Want something like this built?

The catalogue prices the patterns behind this work. Describe your version and the engine will scope it, including an allowance for anything nobody has costed.